The world's puppeteers must cut their strings

The power of labor can regulate the options that world governments decide to pursue when it is relevant to advocating or acting in the name of so called global justice. The difference between the “use of force” also made more recognizably famous by the term foreign policy or preemptive strikes as it was regularly used by virtue of the BUSH doctrine can be determined by the vital role that the global labor force plays in subsisting the global economy through capitalist production. The labor unit is an intrinsic factor that can shift the paradigm of options between the resort to violence, regulatory ambivalence that creates a tendency to be apathetic or just ethical morality when dealing with world order. This is done by the consolidation of united organizations that wield might through sustaining capitalist operations and thus decision making is thrust into the hands of the labor force. That is to say, the decision to be taken falls squarely into the hands of the planetary majority and not the elite class that controls the means of production and has influence within governmental agencies and bureaucracies. Another viable option may come in the shape of extreme interdependence between man and machine to facilitate the smooth operation of the global economy. As this dependence becomes more and more relevant to production, we as a species will see ourselves moving closer together to support each other against the domination of machine against mankind. Machines and artificial intelligence do not have the aptitude to create emotions that are transpired through racism and segregation and this will give them a competitive edge over the historical concept of competition that has been inherent to the human species. Religion and race might be relegated to issues of little or no importance. Despite this rhetoric of uprising, democracy needs to exist within this framework with a fusion of some forms of anarcho-communism to accommodate our brothers and sisters who suffer in silence as the world media strains its lenses on issues of miniscule importance that effect a negligible number in contrast to the vast population of the poor.
Some individuals out there might feel that providing the tools to create an environment of educational opportunity might suffice to alleviate the rift that capitalism and poverty have manifested but this will only lead to an inevitable congruence of more individuals becoming a part of the mainstream that generates more worker units to facilitate the various elements of a capitalist society. This sort of framework will not create more minds to think about individual liberty but instead create a world of individual security within the existing capitalistic framework that will only thrive with the burden vested upon some group of people somewhere usually blocked from our minds and hidden from sight. The free world as it is referred to, is ironic as it destroys all those that are not participatory through its enclaves of business. Ascendance or assimilation to this will create a greater lack benevolence in favor of sustaining individual security within artificially prescribed boundaries at the expense of global human liberty. The passion of the mind can set us free but the enticement of security and maintaining our, or rather capitalistically intended way of life, will keep us shackled to our worldview that is capitalist-centric. Some may identify this talk as that of a person touting the path of professional trouble maker but what else or who else is there to check on the balances of power that governments use to create wealth in the interest of the few at the expense of the many. An idea during some periods of history must be dispersed amongst the common folk through a few to implore those with a conscience to come out and do what is right as textbooks that are printed for mass consumption prefer to work with the minorities that wield the wealth and influence that belongs to everyone globally.